Talking in Code

by Becca Cavell

Sometimes professionals seem to go out of their way to talk in code – and architects are no exception. During presentations to lay-people we’ll often sprinkle our discussions with words like “fenestration” and “masonry cladding” when simpler terms such as “window” and “brick wall” will do just fine. It’s not intellectual superiority that causes this speech defect….it’s simply that sometimes we know an awful lot about certain subjects and forget that not everyone is privy to the same jargon. Sometimes we just need to get the right perspective on the context of a conversation – taking time to do this can profoundly influence the outcome of any given meeting and it’s well worth the effort. I’m going to use a few examples to illustrate ways we can simplify our language and better engage our clients:

Setting Clear Goals

Architects often march into the first design meeting expecting the client to immediately identify their goals for the project. Sometimes this happens as a round-the-table discussion, sometimes as a brainstorming session with flipcharts and markers. And after several weeks of word-smithing, the mixed bags of hopes, aspirations and specific requests are gradually compressed into a contorted and ungrammatical set of “goals” that are often then set aside with a sigh of relief and never referred to again. Isn’t there a more effective way to articulate the client’s goals, and wouldn’t it be great if those goals actually helped shape a positive outcome of the project?

An Example

The University of Oregon (UO)’s Campus Plan establishes an alternative method based on Christopher Alexander’s classic text, “A Pattern Language.” A series of patterns are developed by the User Group (aka the Building Committee) prior to the selection of a design team; per the plan, these are “statements that describe and analyze design issues and suggest ways in which those issues might be resolved.” The User Group reviews UO’s established patterns and selects pertinent patterns for its project, writing additional patterns if necessary to communicate key concepts. The patterns use non-technical language that is accessible to all involved.

Quality of Light

UO COE_Courtyard_people seated

THA’s UO College of Education: The window design and shading systems respond to specific orientation and were developed through extensive modeling and testing for optimum performance.

A typical project might have dozens of patterns and at first this approach struck me as a little bit unmanageable for the design team to keep track of. But having worked with UO on two significant projects I am happy to announce myself a convert to this approach. Our approach was simple: embrace the patterns as a clearly articulated set of client-driven goals, and use them as touch stones at key points in the project’s development to make sure that the design remained on track. And it proved to be a highly effective approach that engaged everyone in the conversation and helped clarify and resolve design debates whenever they arose.

The Simplest Things…..

The majority of THA’s work is public and much of it is for repeat clients.  We sometimes fall into the trap of assuming that everyone understands the language of design. Recently we’ve tried to take a step back from our assumptions and take a moment in the early client meetings to explain some of the words and phrases the team will be using. We also take a little time to explain the process of design itself. We probably all develop graphically appealing, simplified schedules to talk about how the project will unfold. Now we talk about each phase, its anticipated duration, and most importantly what the client group should expect in terms of visual presentations. “Schematic Design” as a phrase means little to a non-architect. So we explain the phases (and their acronyms) and show the development of a completed project from initial sketches to photographs of the final project. We can then return to these images at subsequent meetings to reaffirm the context of the conversation and to help frame the decisions that we are asking our clients to make.

MC sketch

Mercy Corps Global Headquarters early project sketch

 

Mercy Corps Exterior FPO

Mercy Corps Global Headquarters finished project

Why do this?

There is no reason to limit our clients’ ability talk to us candidly about their aspirations and requirements for their projects. Language is an unconscious barrier. Be mindful of your words, and learn to monitor and curb your use of jargon. Think twice before you use charette, curtainwall or storefront, double-loaded corridors, fenestration, and juxtaposition, and please think thrice before using a TLA*.

*three letter acronym

Top image: Morse Code Forever by Ward Cunningham

Leave a Reply

1268

Hacker Builds!

by Garrett Martin

Our website typically shows you beautiful photos of our completed projects, or equally beautiful renderings of our projects “on the boards.” Have you ever wondered what happens in-between, or when those renderings will finally take actual form? Despite how it may appear sometimes, it all doesn’t happen in the blink of an eye or under cover of darkness.

Read more

1253

What Pro Bono Work Has Taught Us

by Audrey Alverson

Pro bono architecture: Why do we do it?

Hacker has long been a signatory of the 1+ Program, which challenges designers to dedicate 1% or more of their time to pro bono service – but through trial and error over the years, we often found it challenging to bring this work to fruition. After a few fits and starts, and some mostly small-scale projects and studies, last year we decided to put some teeth to our commitment to pro bono service. Through this process, we’ve learned that the problem was never a lack of desire or good intentions, but more so a lack of planning.

Read more

1245

Nurturing Growth in Lents Town Center

by Garrett Martin

On Sunday October 23rd of last year, we joined Bremik Construction and the Portland Development Commission to strike golden shovels into the ground and begin construction on the 9101 SE Foster project, a mixed-use multi-family building in the heart of Lents Town Center.

Read more

1237

Why Hacker Started Paying for Parental Leave

by Sarah Bell

This year, Hacker implemented a new paid parental leave policy, covering six weeks at full salary for birth mothers and about four and ½ weeks full salary for a spouse of the parent who gives birth (adoptive parents get the same). This is in addition to the flexible paid time off granted to every Hacker employee.

Read more

1214

A Saturday with Lou

by Scott Barton-Smith

Nearly half of the Hacker team caravanned north to attend the final day of the Bellevue Arts Museum’s retrospective Louis Kahn: The Power of Architecture on April 30th. Although the exhibit includes video interviews of notable architects enthusing Kahn’s work, we had a more interactive guide. Our firm founder Thom Hacker gave us a personalized tour of the exhibit, which includes several projects on which Thom collaborated with his mentor “Lou.” The exhibit features many models and drawings prepared by Kahn’s office spanning projects from the Esherick House to more well know works like The Salk Institute, The Kimbell Art Museum, and the National Assembly Building in Dhaka. The exhibit even includes a full scale reproduction of the famous window seat designed for the Fisher house. Much of this material has not seen the light of day since Kahn’s death and it is remarkable that the large yet delicate cardboard, clay, and wood models survived.

Read more

1198

University of Wyoming Visual Arts Facility Wins COTE Award

by Nic Smith

Hacker is a proud recipient of a 2016 AIA COTE Top Ten Green Projects award for University of Wyoming’s Visual Arts Facility (VAF), a pioneering LEED Platinum facility that has shaped a new approach to health, safety, and sustainability in arts education. The 80,000-SF building consolidates the University’s fine arts program from its scattered locations, establishing a central component of the campus’s new arts district. It also marks a turning point in the campus’s thinking about environmental responsibility. Read more

1188

From the Vaults: High Desert Museum

by Sarah Bell

When the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Central Oregon’s New Home had its dedication last year, I drove to Bend for the day with my two youngest boys, who were both under 5 years old. I arrived several hours before the dedication with both boys needing to expend energy built up over the 3-hour car ride. Not having planned on it, I took them to the High Desert Museum – not because I wanted to show them a Hacker building, but because I knew it would wear them out.

Read more

1183

Designing for Design Schools: What type of collaboration space works?

by Becca Cavell

We’re excited to be working right now with UC Davis on the renovation of the north wing of Cruess Hall – a rather industrial 1950s building that will house screening rooms, labs, and maker spaces for the Cinema & Digital Media and Industrial Design programs. Some of these spaces will be quite industrial themselves, and seem a fitting use for the currently vacant building.  As we begin to look for case studies to inform our work, our client shared this video from Stanford’s D-School, showing 10 days in the life of the D’s central collaboration space. It’s time-lapse, and takes just four minutes to view – and it demonstrates how a very utilitarian space can be the beating heart of an institution if you plan it right, furnish it right, and relax a bit.

Read more

1161

Denny Hall Finally Gets Its Due

by Stephanie Shradar

At the University of Washington, Denny Hall has been awaiting revitalization for nearly a decade. During that time, Hacker has been working on and off again to get UW the final product. The project has gone through funding stalls and starts; the design firm has gone through two name changes; and the building has patiently awaited its new core.

Read more

1148

Hacker is Carbon Neutral

by Sarah Post-Holmberg

Hacker was founded on the idea that architecture should be in service to community. For over three decades the firm has designed enduring spaces that inspire people to contribute to positive cultural change. This guiding vision extends beyond humanity to encompass the natural world and the diversity of species it supports. Over the years, Hacker has developed an aesthetic for buildings that interact dynamically with their surroundings and make humble use of the earth’s resources. Through research, conference engagement, and continuing education, we continue to refine our design process, detailing, and material choices to reflect our priority of preserving the well-being of all life systems on our planet.

Read more