The Great Debate of 2014: What’s next for the Portland Building?

by Audrey Alverson

When I heard Michael Graves would be in Portland to discuss the Portland Building, there was no question that I would be there. I was excited to gain perspective on this oft maligned and (most recently) hotly debated City building directly from its designer, and I knew this would be a quality production, with Randy Gragg (not one for shying away from the tough questions) as the facilitator.

After introductions, Graves started with a presentation of his body of work – immense as it is. Randy stated clearly he wanted to give some context to the audience’s perception of Graves and what he has done beyond the Portland Building. I appreciated this because knowing Randy, I assumed it was a little bit of a dig at the Portland public’s derision of Graves. Maybe we didn’t all have enough information to criticize so harshly?

And just to get this out of the way: I hold strong on the opinion that even considering tearing the building down is nothing short of tragedy. The building does, indeed, have some problems but tearing it down – erasing history – is not the answer.

During the course of the talk, Graves’ demeanor fluctuated from light and humorous to defensive to a little more defensive to downright cranky. He expressed what I think was his genuine love and admiration for the Portland Building and even said he’d visited the building and that it was “glorious.” Graves said he “doesn’t understand the hostility.” He talked of the extremely low budget, the program constraints he was up against, the parking requirements (which he thought were a terrible idea) – and I definitely got the impression that his grand vision for the project lost much of its luster along the way. As Becca Cavell wrote in an earlier post, if you study the original sketches and models you can clearly see that much of the three-dimensional, tactile ornamentation became cheapened with material and other downgrades. A fair point.

Overall, I walked away from this discussion with an unexpected emotion: sadness. It seemed that Graves has been given the impression – through the media and lots of rumors – that EVERYONE in Portland wants to tear this building down. I believe this is far from the truth, but it’s sometimes the case that the loudest (and perhaps most contentious) voices are the only ones really heard. I believe there are many people in Portland who acknowledge the building’s challenges (lack of daylight for building users, the lack of street-level activity, the low ceiling heights), but also respect the building’s significance. Many others “just don’t like it” or “think it’s ugly” and therefore dismiss it. I dismiss those statements as being invalid reactions to any building. It’s not that simple.

I don’t personally find all of Graves’ work (including the Portland Building) visually pleasing, but at the same time, I get a little joy out of seeing his work – its quirk, its unique artistic expression, its bold use of color. The fact is, architectural history is fraught with “successes” and “failures” – with movements between ornament and lack thereof, with architects who were loathed during their lifetimes yet loved in their deaths. The fundamental truth about the buildings we make is that they should serve their users well, they should create healthy places for people to work, they should inspire, and they should function. But they should also be allowed to insert a little color into an otherwise gray world. Even though I don’t love all his work, I firmly believe Graves does that.

There’s still the big question of what we can do to improve the deficiencies of the Portland Building. And while I don’t have any specific solutions, I came away from this talk even more convicted in my position that this building, and its place in our city, should remain. We should recognize that we cannot make it something it’s not, but figure out what we can do with what we have. And then we should embrace this building as part of architectural history, part of our culture, and part of our city.

In Graves’ words: “Tearing this building down would be like killing a child of mine.” A bit dramatic, perhaps, but not to be dismissed.

And now let’s broaden our minds and take a peek at some of Graves’ other work:

michael_graves_2012_driehaus_prize_08_MINNEAPOLIS

Minneapolis Institute of Arts

 

El_Gouna_Steigenberger_01

Steigenberger Hotel in El Gouna, Egypt

 

Denver Public Library

Denver Public Library

 

6_DIA_Exterior_WindowDetail_zoom

Detroit Institute of Art

 

graves-alessi3

Tea service for Alessi

 

Image Credits: Top image: Sam Tenney/DJC; Minneapolis Institute of Art; Steigenberger Hotel; Denver Public Library; Detroit Institute of Art; Alessi

Leave a Reply

1268

Hacker Builds!

by Garrett Martin

Our website typically shows you beautiful photos of our completed projects, or equally beautiful renderings of our projects “on the boards.” Have you ever wondered what happens in-between, or when those renderings will finally take actual form? Despite how it may appear sometimes, it all doesn’t happen in the blink of an eye or under cover of darkness.

Read more

1253

What Pro Bono Work Has Taught Us

by Audrey Alverson

Pro bono architecture: Why do we do it?

Hacker has long been a signatory of the 1+ Program, which challenges designers to dedicate 1% or more of their time to pro bono service – but through trial and error over the years, we often found it challenging to bring this work to fruition. After a few fits and starts, and some mostly small-scale projects and studies, last year we decided to put some teeth to our commitment to pro bono service. Through this process, we’ve learned that the problem was never a lack of desire or good intentions, but more so a lack of planning.

Read more

1245

Nurturing Growth in Lents Town Center

by Garrett Martin

On Sunday October 23rd of last year, we joined Bremik Construction and the Portland Development Commission to strike golden shovels into the ground and begin construction on the 9101 SE Foster project, a mixed-use multi-family building in the heart of Lents Town Center.

Read more

1237

Why Hacker Started Paying for Parental Leave

by Sarah Bell

This year, Hacker implemented a new paid parental leave policy, covering six weeks at full salary for birth mothers and about four and ½ weeks full salary for a spouse of the parent who gives birth (adoptive parents get the same). This is in addition to the flexible paid time off granted to every Hacker employee.

Read more

1214

A Saturday with Lou

by Scott Barton-Smith

Nearly half of the Hacker team caravanned north to attend the final day of the Bellevue Arts Museum’s retrospective Louis Kahn: The Power of Architecture on April 30th. Although the exhibit includes video interviews of notable architects enthusing Kahn’s work, we had a more interactive guide. Our firm founder Thom Hacker gave us a personalized tour of the exhibit, which includes several projects on which Thom collaborated with his mentor “Lou.” The exhibit features many models and drawings prepared by Kahn’s office spanning projects from the Esherick House to more well know works like The Salk Institute, The Kimbell Art Museum, and the National Assembly Building in Dhaka. The exhibit even includes a full scale reproduction of the famous window seat designed for the Fisher house. Much of this material has not seen the light of day since Kahn’s death and it is remarkable that the large yet delicate cardboard, clay, and wood models survived.

Read more

1198

University of Wyoming Visual Arts Facility Wins COTE Award

by Nic Smith

Hacker is a proud recipient of a 2016 AIA COTE Top Ten Green Projects award for University of Wyoming’s Visual Arts Facility (VAF), a pioneering LEED Platinum facility that has shaped a new approach to health, safety, and sustainability in arts education. The 80,000-SF building consolidates the University’s fine arts program from its scattered locations, establishing a central component of the campus’s new arts district. It also marks a turning point in the campus’s thinking about environmental responsibility. Read more

1188

From the Vaults: High Desert Museum

by Sarah Bell

When the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Central Oregon’s New Home had its dedication last year, I drove to Bend for the day with my two youngest boys, who were both under 5 years old. I arrived several hours before the dedication with both boys needing to expend energy built up over the 3-hour car ride. Not having planned on it, I took them to the High Desert Museum – not because I wanted to show them a Hacker building, but because I knew it would wear them out.

Read more

1183

Designing for Design Schools: What type of collaboration space works?

by Becca Cavell

We’re excited to be working right now with UC Davis on the renovation of the north wing of Cruess Hall – a rather industrial 1950s building that will house screening rooms, labs, and maker spaces for the Cinema & Digital Media and Industrial Design programs. Some of these spaces will be quite industrial themselves, and seem a fitting use for the currently vacant building.  As we begin to look for case studies to inform our work, our client shared this video from Stanford’s D-School, showing 10 days in the life of the D’s central collaboration space. It’s time-lapse, and takes just four minutes to view – and it demonstrates how a very utilitarian space can be the beating heart of an institution if you plan it right, furnish it right, and relax a bit.

Read more

1161

Denny Hall Finally Gets Its Due

by Stephanie Shradar

At the University of Washington, Denny Hall has been awaiting revitalization for nearly a decade. During that time, Hacker has been working on and off again to get UW the final product. The project has gone through funding stalls and starts; the design firm has gone through two name changes; and the building has patiently awaited its new core.

Read more

1148

Hacker is Carbon Neutral

by Sarah Post-Holmberg

Hacker was founded on the idea that architecture should be in service to community. For over three decades the firm has designed enduring spaces that inspire people to contribute to positive cultural change. This guiding vision extends beyond humanity to encompass the natural world and the diversity of species it supports. Over the years, Hacker has developed an aesthetic for buildings that interact dynamically with their surroundings and make humble use of the earth’s resources. Through research, conference engagement, and continuing education, we continue to refine our design process, detailing, and material choices to reflect our priority of preserving the well-being of all life systems on our planet.

Read more